Check before commissioning anything
A search takes minutes and can be done before packaging, signage, or marketing material gets designed around a name that might already belong to someone else entirely.
Available now
In build
The whole team
Nineteen specialists, each with a defined job and an honest status label.
See all nineteenThe business owner finds out, before investing in branding, whether an identical or very similar trademark already exists in their business category.
Works with
What it does
The owner enters a proposed brand name and selects the relevant goods/services class, and Vakil queries India's public trademark register to show existing marks that are identical or closely similar. Results are presented as "found in the public register" facts, with a clear note that a full clearance opinion (including phonetic and visual similarity judgment) requires a trademark professional.
A home-based skincare brand owner has settled on a name she loves and is one click away from commissioning packaging design when a nagging thought stops her: what if someone else already owns it. Finding out after the labels are printed would be a costlier way to learn the answer.
Vakil queries India's public trademark register directly, so she can check before spending a rupee on branding. She enters the proposed name and picks the relevant goods and services class, and Vakil returns marks that are identical or closely similar, presented as facts found in the public register — not as an opinion on her chances. A full clearance opinion, including the phonetic and visual similarity judgment a name like hers might raise, is a job for a trademark professional, and Vakil says so plainly rather than pretending a database search can substitute for it.
Vakil runs this directly on the platforms your customers already use — no separate app for them to install.
How it works
Type the brand name or wordmark being considered, exactly as it would be used commercially, so the search results genuinely reflect the actual name in question, precisely as it's truly intended for real, actual use.
Choose the goods or services category the name would be used under — cosmetics, apparel, food products — since trademark protection in India is organised entirely by class, and results depend heavily on that choice.
The search runs against India's official Trade Marks Registry public search, returning marks that are identical or closely similar in the selected class as they currently appear on record right now, quite exactly and precisely.
Results are shown as what's currently found in the public register — not as a verdict on whether the proposed name is genuinely safe to use, register, or launch commercially, anywhere at all, under any circumstances.
Why it matters
A search takes minutes and can be done before packaging, signage, or marketing material gets designed around a name that might already belong to someone else entirely.
Results come from India's own public Trade Marks Registry search, not a third-party guess or a paraphrase of what might actually be registered somewhere else.
Vakil states clearly that a full clearance opinion needs a trademark professional, rather than implying that a quick database search alone settles the entire question.
The detail
What this tool does is narrow and mechanical: it queries the public Trade Marks Registry and returns marks that are identical or closely similar to the proposed name within the selected class, as the register currently shows them. This is a factual lookup, and Vakil presents it as one — the results are what is found in the register today, not an assessment of what those results mean for the skincare brand's prospects. A search returning no exact matches is genuinely useful, but not the same as a clean bill of health.
The reason it isn't the same is that trademark clearance is a professional judgment built on more than an exact-match search. A trademark professional assessing the same name would also weigh phonetic similarity — names that sound alike even when spelled differently — and visual similarity in how a mark might be styled, both requiring trained judgment a database query cannot replicate. Vakil is explicit that this deeper assessment sits beyond what a search tool can offer.
There is also a timing gap worth knowing about. The public register's search index can lag behind very recent filings, so a name filed by someone else last week might not yet appear as a conflict — a search returning no matches reflects what is indexed today, not a guarantee nothing has been filed since. This is one more reason the search is framed as a first check rather than a final answer, not a replacement for professional judgment.
Industry use cases
8 industries where Vakil applies this directly.
A wholesale distributor whose buyer has not paid an invoice 60 days past the agreed term uses the delayed-payment-notice-preparation capability to draft a factual reminder letter and reads the linked explanation of the MSEFC reference process before deciding whether to pursue it.
See the b2b sales playbookA home-based skincare brand owner runs a proposed product-line name through the trademark-name-availability-check before commissioning packaging design, then separately requests a plain-english explanation of a co-packer's manufacturing agreement.
See the beauty and cosmetics playbookA coaching institute founder converting from a proprietorship to a private limited company uses the document-checklist-builder to see what is generally needed, then books a lawyer consultation using the question-prep tool to confirm specifics with an advocate.
See the education playbookA furniture seller whose delivery partner damaged a high-value shipment uses the consumer-complaint-preparation-helper to structure their complaint against the courier before submitting it through the National Consumer Helpline.
See the home decor and furnishing playbookA small agency about to sign a new retainer client runs the agreement through the plain-language-clause-flagger to see whether a dispute-resolution clause is present before sending it to their advocate for final review.
See the marketing agencies playbookA restaurant owner who received a written complaint letter from a food-delivery aggregator about a recurring order-fulfillment dispute uses the notice-and-letter-response-drafting-helper to prepare a factual first draft of their reply before their advocate finalizes it.
See the restaurants and food playbookA salon owner entering a franchise agreement with a brand uses the plain-language-clause-flagger to see whether territory and termination clauses are present before their scheduled review with a franchise lawyer.
See the spas and salons playbookA tour operator whose transport vendor cancelled a confirmed booking at the last minute uses the consumer-complaint-preparation-helper to structure a complaint against the vendor while separately checking their own customer-facing booking terms for a force-majeure clause using the document-explainer.
See the travel and tourism playbookMore from Vakil
The business owner understands what a contract, notice, or legal letter actually says and what it asks of them, without waiting for a lawyer callback just to understand the basics.
Learn moreThe business owner walks into a paid lawyer consultation with an organized list of questions and facts, so the lawyer's limited time is spent advising rather than gathering basic information.
Learn moreThe business owner gets a plain-language overview of a legal topic relevant to their business (e.g., what a security deposit clause typically covers) before they need it urgently.
Learn moreThe business owner knows exactly which documents and pieces of information to collect for a common business task (hiring, renting, registering) before starting it, avoiding wasted trips and delays.
Learn moreThe business gets a professionally structured starting draft for a common business document (NDA, service agreement, offer letter) instead of writing one from a blank page.
Learn moreThe business owner sees which standard clauses (termination, liability, confidentiality, dispute resolution) are present, weak, or absent in a contract before signing it, so they know what to specifically ask a lawyer about.
Learn moreQuestions
A clear search result means no identical or closely similar mark currently appears in the selected class on the public register — it's a genuinely useful signal, but it isn't a clearance opinion in itself. It doesn't account for phonetic or visual similarity a trained professional would check, and the register's index can lag behind very recent filings. For a decision with real money behind it, a full clearance search from a trademark professional is worth the cost.
No. Vakil surfaces what's currently in the public register as a factual result — it never opines on the likelihood of a successful registration or predicts how the Trademarks Registry will assess the application in the end at all. Registration outcomes depend on examination criteria and potential oppositions that go well beyond what an availability search alone can ever determine.
This tool checks the public register for identical or closely similar marks in your chosen class — a factual, keyword-based lookup, nothing more. A full clearance search, done by a trademark professional, adds judgment about phonetic similarity, visual similarity, and broader infringement risk that a database match alone can't capture. Think of this as a fast first filter, not a replacement for that fuller professional assessment.
A few things could explain it — the register's index may not yet have reflected a very recent filing at the time you searched, or the conflict could be based on phonetic or visual similarity rather than an identical name, which an exact-match search isn't built to catch. This is exactly the gap a professional clearance opinion exists to close before you commit to a name commercially and publicly.
The rest of your stack
No rip-and-replace — check if a business name or logo is already taken works alongside the systems already running your business.
Coming soon