Fixes, not just a score
The real estate agency gets a specific list — this heading is missing the keyword, this meta description is too long — instead of a number with no clear next step attached.
Available now
In build
The whole team
Nineteen specialists, each with a defined job and an honest status label.
See all nineteenThe business knows before publishing whether a page is likely to rank, and gets specific fixes instead of a vague score.
Works with
What it does
The user pastes a URL or draft, and Lekha checks title/meta alignment, heading structure, keyword placement, and content freshness signals, returning a prioritized list of fixes. Each fix links to the exact sentence or tag that needs changing.
A real estate agency publishes a neighbourhood guide, waits three months, and still doesn't know why it isn't ranking — was it the title, the headings, missing keywords in the wrong places, or something else entirely. Guessing at fixes one at a time, republishing, and waiting another few weeks to see if anything changed is a slow, frustrating way to find out.
This checks a URL or a draft against the on-page signals that matter for ranking — title and meta alignment, heading structure, keyword placement, freshness — and returns a prioritised list of specific fixes, each one linked to the exact sentence or tag that needs changing, rather than a vague overall score with no clear next step attached to it.
Lekha runs this directly on the platforms your customers already use — no separate app for them to install.
How it works
Provide either a live page's address or the text of a draft still being worked on, and Lekha fetches and parses the content to check its structure against what the target keyword needs to rank well.
Title length, meta description alignment, heading hierarchy, and keyword placement are checked against known on-page best practices, catching the mechanical issues a quick manual scan would otherwise miss entirely, before any slower relevance-based checking happens on the same page.
A separate check looks at whether the content actually reads well and stays relevant to the target keyword's likely intent, beyond what a rule-based check alone can determine, since a page can pass every mechanical test and still read poorly to an actual visitor.
Issues are ranked by likely impact and each one points to the exact sentence or tag responsible, so the fix is specific and immediately actionable rather than a vague instruction to "improve SEO" generally, with no clear starting point for where to begin.
Why it matters
The real estate agency gets a specific list — this heading is missing the keyword, this meta description is too long — instead of a number with no clear next step attached.
A draft can be checked before it goes live, fixing structural problems while the page is still easy to edit rather than after it's been indexed for months.
Each flagged issue links to the exact sentence or tag responsible, cutting the guesswork of figuring out which part of a long page a vague suggestion is actually about.
The detail
A score from this tool reflects a snapshot, not a live, continuously updated ranking position — checked against the page's current content and whatever competitive signals were available at the time, carrying a "checked on" timestamp for exactly this reason. Search results shift as competitors update their own pages, and a score that felt accurate a month ago can be stale today without the checked page itself changing. Treating a score as a permanent verdict rather than a point-in-time reading is the most common way this tool gets over-trusted.
Fetching a live URL depends on the checker reading the page's real content, and JavaScript-heavy sites that render most text client-side can be a genuine problem — if meaningful content only appears after scripts run, a fetch-based checker may see a mostly empty page and produce a misleadingly poor result unrelated to what a visitor actually sees. A page scoring unexpectedly badly is worth testing by pasting the draft text directly instead, to rule out a fetch problem first.
The fixes suggested here are about on-page signals — structure, keyword placement, meta alignment — and that's one input into ranking among several a search engine weighs, not the only one. A page passing every on-page check here can still rank behind a competitor with stronger backlinks or a more established domain, and this tool doesn't claim otherwise; it solves the part of the ranking problem within the business's direct control.
Industry use cases
10 industries where Lekha applies this directly.
A sales manager sets up a persona for "IT decision-maker at a mid-size manufacturer," and every rep on the team generates cold-email drafts from the same persona so outreach feels coordinated rather than ad hoc.
See the b2b sales playbookA regional NBFC drafts a loan-product social post, and Lekha flags the line mentioning an interest rate range as a regulated claim, holding the post in a pending-review queue until the compliance officer confirms the number matches the current approved rate sheet.
See the banking and finance playbookA skincare brand uploads its full product line as a spreadsheet with ingredients and benefits per item, and Lekha generates a description and a caption for each product in one bulk run instead of one at a time.
See the beauty and cosmetics playbookA test-prep institute asks Lekha for a blog post targeting the keyword "best online coaching for class 10 boards," and Lekha returns a structured draft with headings and an FAQ section, with any specific outcome claim about pass rates flagged for the institute to verify before publishing.
See the education playbookA freelance interior consultant uses Lekha to turn one client project photo caption into a LinkedIn post, an Instagram caption, and a one-line portfolio blurb, all in the same evening.
See the freelancers and consultants playbookA physiotherapy clinic drafts a social post about a new treatment offering, and Lekha flags the phrase implying guaranteed pain relief as a health claim needing review, holding it until the treating physiotherapist approves the wording.
See the health and wellness playbookA furniture retailer uploads a new collection's specs and Lekha drafts descriptions for the e-commerce listing plus a matching Instagram caption set, keeping material and dimension details exactly as supplied.
See the home decor and furnishing playbookAn agency managing five retail clients keeps five separate brand-voice profiles in Lekha, so the same campaign-brief-to-assets workflow produces distinctly different-sounding output for each client from the same underlying template.
See the marketing agencies playbookA broker pastes a property's square footage, bedroom count, and location, and Lekha drafts a listing description and a short email to interested buyers, both built strictly from the supplied facts.
See the real estate playbookA tour operator asks for a Kerala backwaters package description in both English and Hindi, and Lekha produces two natural-reading versions rather than a literal translation of one into the other.
See the travel and tourism playbookMore from Lekha
The business gets copy that consistently sounds like them, in every language, without re-explaining tone in every prompt.
Learn moreThe business drafts a usable first version of an ad, caption, email, or product description in seconds instead of starting from a blank page.
Learn moreThe business can dial a single draft from formal to playful (or vice versa) without rewriting it from scratch.
Learn moreThe business reaches Hindi-speaking and code-mixed audiences with copy that reads naturally, not like a literal translation.
Learn moreThe business turns one piece of English copy into ready-to-use versions in other languages without hiring a translator for routine content.
Learn moreThe business gets a blog post or landing page draft built around a target keyword, ready to publish with minimal editing.
Learn moreQuestions
Not necessarily — the score reflects a snapshot of the page and the competitive landscape at the moment it was checked, and it's timestamped for exactly this reason. Competitors publish and update their own pages continuously, so a score can go stale without anything on the checked page itself changing, which is why re-checking periodically matters more than treating one score as permanently settled.
If the site renders most of its content through JavaScript after the initial page load, a fetch-based checker can see a mostly empty page and score it poorly, even though a real visitor's browser displays everything correctly. Pasting the draft text directly instead of checking the live URL is a good way to rule this out before assuming the content itself is genuinely the problem.
No — this checks on-page signals specifically, which is one input into ranking that's genuinely within the business's control to fix directly, but search engines also weigh factors like backlinks and overall domain authority that this tool doesn't measure at all. A page that passes every on-page check here can still rank behind a stronger competitor for reasons entirely outside what this particular tool checks.
The core check is built around a business's own URL or draft against a target keyword, and any competitive-gap analysis — what a ranking competitor covers that this page doesn't — is an optional add-on that depends on a connected search-data source being available. Without that connection, the check focuses on the submitted page's own on-page signals rather than a side-by-side comparison against a specific competitor's page.
The rest of your stack
No rip-and-replace — score and improve on-page seo works alongside the systems already running your business.
Coming soon